Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ginekol Pol ; 91(6): 324-330, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32374017

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We investigate how concurrent high-risk (hr) HPV (human papillomavirus) genotypes affect CIN2-3 risk and evaluate the relationship of different genotype combinations with cervical epithelial lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included HPV positive patients between the ages of 30 and 60 who underwent liquid-based cervical smears and HPV screening through community-based, cervical cancer screening programs between June 2015 and June 2017. The impact of the increase in hrHPV types was calculated by estimating how it changed the odds ratio of CIN2-3 risk. RESULTS: The rate of multiple concurrent HPV infections was 48.7% in the CIN2-3 group and 58.4% in the CIN1 group. Among patients in the CIN2-3 and CIN1 groups, the most common HPV coinfection was respectively HPV 16+31 and HPV 16+51. The HPV 51 ratio in CIN1 patients was 28.9% and the HPV 51 ratio in the CIN2-3 patient was 6.6%. With every increase in the number of hrHPV infection types, the frequency of CIN2-3 decreased [OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.95]. For all hrHPV combinations, the addition of HPV 16 was associated with a higher risk of CIN2-3. CONCLUSIONS: An increase in number of hrHPV types is associated with lower CIN2-3 risk. Further cohort studies with larger samples are needed to clarify this relationship. The available evidence suggests that HPV 16 genotype plays an important role in patients with high-grade cervical lesions and has a negative impact on the cervix in concurrent multiple HPV infections.


Assuntos
Colo do Útero/patologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Displasia do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Colo do Útero/virologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Carga Viral , Displasia do Colo do Útero/virologia
2.
Eurasian J Med ; 51(3): 214-218, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31692751

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of abdominal binder usage on mobilization, postoperative pain, and distress after cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective randomized controlled study was conducted between September 1, 2017 and January 31, 2018 at Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. A total of 89 women undergoing elective cesarean were randomized to the study (binder, n=45) or control (no binder, n=44) groups. Patients in the study group were fitted with a binder before leaving the operating room. Mobilization (6-minute walk test), postoperative pain (measured by Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire and Visual Analog Scale), and perceived distress status of both groups were evaluated within 8th (first mobilization time), 24th, and 48th h of surgery. RESULTS: We found that the binder group (BG) walked longer than the control group during the 6-minute walking distance test. At the first mobilization time (postoperative 8th h), the BG (99.4±27.3 m) covered significantly more distance than the control group (81.0±22.2 m) (p=0.001) in the walking distance test. At postoperative 24th h, the McGill pain score in the BG was significantly lower than that in the control group (p=0.004). For all three test times, the Symptom Distress Scale of the BG was lower than that of the control group (postoperative 8th h p=0.024, 24th h p<0.001, and 48th h p<0.001). CONCLUSION: The evidence is consistent with abdominal binder usage after cesarean section decreasing the feeling of distress and increasing mobility.

3.
Diagn Cytopathol ; 46(4): 326-330, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29460502

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: According to the American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology (ASCCP), a co-test is recommended for patients one year after the detection of non-HPV 16/18 viral types in association with a negative cervical cytology. In this study, we used immediate colposcopy to evaluate the risks to the patient during the one year waiting period. METHODS: We included 544 Hpv-positive/cervical cytology-negative patients who underwent cervical cancer screening from June 2015 to June 2017. Cytological specimens were classified using the Bethesta method on a liquid based preparation. We used the Hybrid Capture 2 system to define HPV DNA. Biopsies were performed on all patients under colposcopy. RESULTS: Three hundred and seventy-five patients had HPV types 16/18 and 169 had non-HPV-16/18 oncogenic types. Of the 169 patients who had non-HPV-16/18 oncogenic types, 151 (89%) had no dysplasia, 16 (9.4%) had CIN 1, and 2 (1.1%) had CIN 2/CIN 3. CONCLUSION: For the patients who had cervical cytology negative/non-HPV-16/18 positive, we detected that 1.1% of these women had CIN 2-3. For this reason, by chasing the algorithm recommended by guidelines, gynecologists take risk missing a diagnosis of CIN 2 plus lesion in 1.1% of patients.


Assuntos
Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano/métodos , Infecções por Papillomavirus/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/patologia , Adulto , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Testes de DNA para Papilomavírus Humano/normas , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 16/isolamento & purificação , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções por Papillomavirus/virologia , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...